Comparing Flowbite vs Meraki UI. Which one is better in
2026?
Flowbite Meraki UI
Looking for a Flowbite alternative? This page compares Flowbite
and Meraki UI, two popular UI component libraries. We are comparing features, size,
efficiency and usage data to help you choose which component library is better for your next
project.
Flowbite
Meraki UI
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
ALL
Frameworks
Flowbite is framework agnostic and works everywhere
ALL
Frameworks
Meraki UI is framework agnostic and works everywhere
55
Unique components
Flowbite has 67 Components, 55 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
18
Unique components
Meraki UI has 31 Components, 18 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
2
Built-in Themes
Flowbite has light and dark themes
2
Built-in Themes
Meraki UI has light and dark themes
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
132KB
JavaScript size
Imported JavaScript bundle size (minified)
17kB
JavaScript size
Meraki UI requires Alpine.js
22
Dependencies
Flowbite has 22 third-party dependencies. Using more third-party dependencies increases the risk of security vulnerabilities, compatibility problems, and long-term maintenance headaches from deprecated packages.
0
Dependencies
Meraki UI has no dependencies, but it requires Alpine.js
9.6MB
Dependency size
0
Dependency size
Meraki UI has no dependencies, but it requires Alpine.js
9300
GitHub stars
2600
GitHub stars
166000
Used by open source projects
Based on GitHub's public repositories
?
Used by open source projects
Can't measure
634000
NPM downloads
Weekly downloads from NPM
?
NPM downloads
Can't measure
Yes
CDN
Flowbite CSS file is available on CDN
Yes
CDN
Meraki UI uses Tailwind CSS class names which is available on CDN
No
Semantic class names
Flowbite does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Semantic class names
Meraki UI does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Global customizations
Flowbite requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
No
Global customizations
Meraki UI requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
No
works without Node.js
Flowbite requires a Node.js environment
Yes
works without Node.js
Meraki UI does not requires a Node.js environment
No
No-build version
Flowbite does not provide micro CSS files for each component
No
No-build version
Meraki UI does not provide micro CSS files for each component
No
P3 colors
Flowbite does not use wide-gamut P3 colors by default
No
P3 colors
Meraki UI does not use wide-gamut P3 colors by default
Yes
RTL support
Flowbite supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
Yes
RTL support
Meraki UI supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
No
Runtime CSS customization
Flowbite customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time
No
Runtime CSS customization
Meraki UI customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time
This comparison page is for informational purposes only and does not mean to criticize libraries
or projects. Information is based on GitHub public data, NPM registry data and official
documentation websites of the libraries. If you found any outdated information, please open a PR
to update it. All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners.