Comparing HyperUI vs Meraki UI. Which one is better in
2026?
HyperUI Meraki UI
Looking for a HyperUI alternative? This page compares HyperUI
and Meraki UI, two popular UI component libraries. We are comparing features, size,
efficiency and usage data to help you choose which component library is better for your next
project.
🚀
HyperUI
Meraki UI
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
ALL
Frameworks
HyperUI is framework agnostic and works everywhere
ALL
Frameworks
Meraki UI is framework agnostic and works everywhere
19
Unique components
HyperUI has 24 Components, 19 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
18
Unique components
Meraki UI has 31 Components, 18 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
2
Built-in Themes
HyperUI has light and dark themes
2
Built-in Themes
Meraki UI has light and dark themes
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
0
JavaScript size
HyperUI doesn't ship JavaScript to browsers
17kB
JavaScript size
Meraki UI requires Alpine.js
1
Dependencies
HyperUI has no dependencies, but it requires @tailwindcss/forms plugin
0
Dependencies
Meraki UI has no dependencies, but it requires Alpine.js
65kB
Dependency size
HyperUI has no dependencies, but it requires @tailwindcss/forms plugin
0
Dependency size
Meraki UI has no dependencies, but it requires Alpine.js
12000
GitHub stars
2600
GitHub stars
?
Used by open source projects
Can't measure
?
Used by open source projects
Can't measure
?
NPM downloads
Can't measure
?
NPM downloads
Can't measure
Yes
CDN
HyperUI uses Tailwind CSS class names which is available on CDN
Yes
CDN
Meraki UI uses Tailwind CSS class names which is available on CDN
No
Semantic class names
HyperUI does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Semantic class names
Meraki UI does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Global customizations
HyperUI requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
No
Global customizations
Meraki UI requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
Yes
works without Node.js
HyperUI does not requires a Node.js environment
Yes
works without Node.js
Meraki UI does not requires a Node.js environment
No
No-build version
HyperUI does not provide micro CSS files for each component
No
No-build version
Meraki UI does not provide micro CSS files for each component
Yes
P3 colors
HyperUI uses wide-gamut P3 colors by default
No
P3 colors
Meraki UI does not use wide-gamut P3 colors by default
Yes
RTL support
HyperUI supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
Yes
RTL support
Meraki UI supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
No
Runtime CSS customization
HyperUI customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time
No
Runtime CSS customization
Meraki UI customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time
This comparison page is for informational purposes only and does not mean to criticize libraries
or projects. Information is based on GitHub public data, NPM registry data and official
documentation websites of the libraries. If you found any outdated information, please open a PR
to update it. All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners.