Comparing Bootstrap vs Flowbite. Which one is better in
2026?
Bootstrap Flowbite
Looking for a Bootstrap alternative? This page compares Bootstrap
and Flowbite, two popular UI component libraries. We are comparing features, size,
efficiency and usage data to help you choose which component library is better for your next
project.
Bootstrap
Flowbite
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
ALL
Frameworks
Bootstrap is framework agnostic and works everywhere
ALL
Frameworks
Flowbite is framework agnostic and works everywhere
28
Unique components
Bootstrap has 32 Components, 28 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
55
Unique components
Flowbite has 67 Components, 55 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
2
Built-in Themes
Bootstrap has light and dark themes
2
Built-in Themes
Flowbite has light and dark themes
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
24.6KB
JavaScript size
JavaScript bundle size (minified)
132KB
JavaScript size
Imported JavaScript bundle size (minified)
0
Dependencies
Bootstrap has no dependencies.
22
Dependencies
Flowbite has 22 third-party dependencies. Using more third-party dependencies increases the risk of security vulnerabilities, compatibility problems, and long-term maintenance headaches from deprecated packages.
0
Dependency size
9.6MB
Dependency size
174000
GitHub stars
9300
GitHub stars
6300000
Used by open source projects
Based on GitHub's public repositories
166000
Used by open source projects
Based on GitHub's public repositories
4700000
NPM downloads
Weekly downloads from NPM
634000
NPM downloads
Weekly downloads from NPM
Yes
CDN
Bootstrap CSS file is available on CDN
Yes
CDN
Flowbite CSS file is available on CDN
Yes
Semantic class names
Bootstrap uses semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Semantic class names
Flowbite does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
Yes
Global customizations
Bootstrap provides component-level CSS variables that let you adjust colors, sizes, spacing, radius, and other styles to match your design.
No
Global customizations
Flowbite requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
Yes
works without Node.js
Bootstrap does not require a Node.js environment
No
works without Node.js
Flowbite requires a Node.js environment
No
No-build version
Bootstrap does not provide micro CSS files for each component
No
No-build version
Flowbite does not provide micro CSS files for each component
No
P3 colors
Bootstrap does not use wide-gamut P3 colors by default
No
P3 colors
Flowbite does not use wide-gamut P3 colors by default
Yes
RTL support
Bootstrap supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
Yes
RTL support
Flowbite supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
Yes
Runtime CSS customization
Bootstrap uses CSS variables for design customization at runtime
No
Runtime CSS customization
Flowbite customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time
This comparison page is for informational purposes only and does not mean to criticize libraries
or projects. Information is based on GitHub public data, NPM registry data and official
documentation websites of the libraries. If you found any outdated information, please open a PR
to update it. All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners.