Comparing NuxtUI vs HyperUI. Which one is better in
2026?
NuxtUI HyperUI
Looking for a NuxtUI alternative? This page compares NuxtUI
and HyperUI, two popular UI component libraries. We are comparing features, size,
efficiency and usage data to help you choose which component library is better for your next
project.
NuxtUI
🚀
HyperUI
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
MIT
License
Open source MIT License
Only Vue
Frameworks
NuxtUI works only with Vue
ALL
Frameworks
HyperUI is framework agnostic and works everywhere
37
Unique components
NuxtUI has 50 Components, 37 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
19
Unique components
HyperUI has 24 Components, 19 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
2
Built-in Themes
NuxtUI has light and dark themes, the primary color is customizable
2
Built-in Themes
HyperUI has light and dark themes
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
No
Supports more than two themes
Does not support more than 2 themes at the same time
85kB
JavaScript size
Imported JavaScript bundle size (minified)
0
JavaScript size
HyperUI doesn't ship JavaScript to browsers
259
Dependencies
NuxtUI has 259 third-party dependencies. Using more third-party dependencies increases the risk of security vulnerabilities, compatibility problems, and long-term maintenance headaches from deprecated packages.
1
Dependencies
HyperUI has no dependencies, but it requires @tailwindcss/forms plugin
151MB
Dependency size
65kB
Dependency size
HyperUI has no dependencies, but it requires @tailwindcss/forms plugin
6700
GitHub stars
12000
GitHub stars
?
Used by open source projects
No data available
?
Used by open source projects
Can't measure
412000
NPM downloads
Weekly downloads from NPM
?
NPM downloads
Can't measure
No
CDN
NuxtUI CSS file is not available on CDN
Yes
CDN
HyperUI uses Tailwind CSS class names which is available on CDN
No
Semantic class names
NuxtUI does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Semantic class names
HyperUI does not use semantic CSS class names. Using semantic and descriptive CSS class names improves readability and maintainability of code independent of the current framework.
No
Global customizations
NuxtUI requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
No
Global customizations
HyperUI requires changing class names one by one at build time to do customization
No
works without Node.js
NuxtUI requires a Node.js environment
Yes
works without Node.js
HyperUI does not requires a Node.js environment
No
No-build version
NuxtUI does not provide micro CSS files for each component
No
No-build version
HyperUI does not provide micro CSS files for each component
Yes
P3 colors
NuxtUI uses wide-gamut P3 colors by default
Yes
P3 colors
HyperUI uses wide-gamut P3 colors by default
Yes
RTL support
NuxtUI supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
Yes
RTL support
HyperUI supports right-to-left (RTL) layouts
No
Runtime CSS customization
NuxtUI customizations requires changing JavaScript props at build time
No
Runtime CSS customization
HyperUI customizations requires changing Tailwind CSS class names at build time
This comparison page is for informational purposes only and does not mean to criticize libraries
or projects. Information is based on GitHub public data, NPM registry data and official
documentation websites of the libraries. If you found any outdated information, please open a PR
to update it. All trademarks, logos and brand names are the property of their respective owners.