daisyUI is a better Bulma Alternative
daisyUI focuses on CSS classes, design tokens, and themes. Bulma usually brings a more framework-shaped component model, which can add setup and maintenance work.
Bulma is a free, open-source CSS framework based on Flexbox. It provides a set of pre-built components and styles for building responsive web interfaces.
daisyUI is a component library for Tailwind CSS that provides pre-designed components with theming capabilities. It is framework-agnostic, meaning it can be used in any web project, and it doesn't ship any JavaScript to the browser.
daisyUI and Bulma compared by setup, scope, and maintenance
Choosing a Bulma alternative is less about chasing one metric and more about how the library fits your project over time. The data gives a useful starting point: 65 daisyUI components versus 20 in Bulma, 35 built-in daisyUI themes versus 2, and 0 daisyUI dependencies versus 1 for Bulma. daisyUI is built around Tailwind CSS classes, CSS variables, and framework-agnostic HTML, so the UI layer stays portable while your app keeps its own JavaScript behavior.
Components
Bulma gives you 20 unique components. daisyUI gives you 65, but the larger difference is how those components are used: they are class names you can apply to normal HTML instead of a separate component API you have to wrap, import, or adapt.
Unique components
daisyUI has 68 components, 65 of them are unique – for example pagination and button group are considered as same.
Themes
Bulma lists 2 built-in themes. daisyUI includes 35, and the theme system is based on CSS variables, so you can switch themes at runtime, keep dark mode simple, and customize colors without rewriting every component.
Built-in Themes
daisyUI has 35 themes
Performance
Bulma has a JavaScript size of 7.4kB, while daisyUI is 0. That matters when a page only needs styling. daisyUI lets your framework handle state and interaction while the component styles stay in CSS.
Compatibility
Bulma is built for ALL. daisyUI works across ALL because it styles HTML with Tailwind CSS classes. That makes it easier to use the same design language in React, Vue, Svelte, server-rendered templates, static HTML, or a mixed stack.
Customization
Bulma can be the right choice when you want its exact component model. daisyUI is stronger when you want Tailwind CSS control, semantic component classes, runtime CSS variables, P3 colors, RTL support, and native CSS features without locking the markup to one framework.
Community & Support
daisyUI's GitHub presence gives teams a public record of activity, releases, issues, and community discussion. Weekly NPM downloads put daisyUI ahead of Bulma, pointing to broader day-to-day use in real projects.
Used by open source projects
Based on GitHub's public repositories
NPM downloads
Weekly downloads from NPM
Open GitHub issues
As of June 2026
Why daisyUI is better than Bulma
Avoid Bulma if you require a component library with extensive JavaScript-based interactivity or advanced features. Also, consider the need for custom JavaScript to implement interactive elements and the potential for CSS bloat with extensive customization.
Use daisyUI when you want to rapidly prototype or build a project with a consistent design system based on Tailwind CSS. It's well-suited for projects where you need a large variety of customizable components and theme options without writing a lot of custom CSS.
Install daisyUI
1. Install daisyUI as a Node package:
npm i -D daisyui@latestpnpm add -D daisyui@latestyarn add -D daisyui@latestbun add -D daisyui@latestdeno i -D npm:daisyui@latest2. Add daisyUI to app.css:
@import "tailwindcss";
@plugin "daisyui"; This comparison is for informational purposes only. Information is based on GitHub public data, NPM registry data and official documentation websites. If you found any outdated information, please open a PR to update it.